1.4.2 Al-Ghazali's Departure from Necessary Causation

This topic explains how and why Al-Ghazali changed his view on causation. He moved from believing in necessary causation to arguing that events are a continuation rather than direct causation. This shift had a deep impact on philosophy and influenced later thinkers like David Hume.

Definition

Al-Ghazali's Departure from Necessary Causation: The shift in Al-Ghazali's thinking from the idea that cause and effect are necessarily linked to the idea that events occur in a habitual succession that God can suspend at any time.

Continuation of Events: The idea that events occur one after another in a habitual pattern, without a necessary causal link between them.

Main Idea

Al-Ghazali initially believed in necessary causation — that a burning flame necessarily burns cotton. But later he departed from this view. He argued that what we observe is a continuation of events, not direct causation. All things have a nature and act in a habitual way because nature follows specific principles. God created the universe, and He can suspend the habitual succession of events according to His wish.

Core Concept

The core of Al-Ghazali's departure is that God's will is above all natural laws. If the link between cause and effect were necessary, then God could not intervene or perform miracles. But Al-Ghazali argued that God is the ultimate cause of all events, and He can break the habitual pattern whenever He wishes. This means that what we call "cause and effect" is really just a habitual succession of events that God has established.

Detailed Explanation

The Initial View: Necessary Causation

• Al-Ghazali initially believed in necessary causation.
• He argued that a burning flame necessarily burns a nearby piece of cotton.
• He concluded that there is a causal link between the flame and the cotton.
• This link is necessary and always true.

The Departure

At some stage in his life, Al-Ghazali departed from his previous point of view.

• What we observe around is the continuation of events, not a kind of direct causation.
• Events occur one after another in a habitual pattern.
• There is no necessary causal link between them.

The Reason for the Departure

• Sticking to the theory of necessary causation would reject the concept of God's will.
• If the flame necessarily burns the cotton, then God cannot stop it.
• But God is all-powerful and can do anything.
• Therefore, the link between cause and effect cannot be necessary.

The New View: Habitual Succession

• All things have a nature and act in a habitual way because nature follows some specific principles.
• God created the universe (nature) and He can suspend the habitual succession of events according to His wish.
• What we see as "cause and effect" is really just a habitual pattern that God has established.

The Blind Man Example

• A person who couldn't open his eyes.
• One day, miraculously, the person became able to open his eyelids and see the beauty of the world.
• He thought the opening of eyelids to be the cause of seeing things around him.
• But actually, it was the rays of light striking his eyes that made him see.
• The blind man confused the succession of events with causation.

David Hume's Support

• Hume added that there is no natural glue (causal link) that can hold the events around us together.
• Rather, they occur one after the other.
• This is known as Hume's skepticism about causation.

Do You Know?

God shows miracles by suspending the causal link and habitual course of events.

Interesting Information

• Al-Ghazali's departure from necessary causation was a major shift in his philosophy.
• It emphasized the supremacy of God's will over natural laws.
• It influenced David Hume and other Western philosophers.
• It raised important questions about the nature of causation and miracles.

Intermediate Level

Al-Ghazali's Departure from Necessary Causation marks a major shift in his philosophical thinking.

The Initial View

• The link between cause and effect is necessary and always true.
• Example: A burning flame necessarily burns a nearby piece of cotton.
• There is a causal link between the flame and the cotton.

The Departure

• He imagined that what we observe is a continuation of events, not direct causation.
• Events occur one after another in a habitual pattern.
• There is no necessary causal link between them.

The Reason

• Sticking to necessary causation would reject the concept of God's will.
• If the flame necessarily burns the cotton, then God cannot stop it.
• But God is all-powerful and can do anything.
• Therefore, the link between cause and effect cannot be necessary.

The New View

• All things have a nature and act in a habitual way because nature follows some specific principles.
• God created the universe (nature) and He can suspend the habitual succession of events according to His wish.
• What we see as "cause and effect" is really just a habitual pattern that God has established.

The Blind Man Example

• A person who couldn't open his eyes.
• One day, miraculously, he became able to open his eyelids and see the world.
• He thought the opening of eyelids was the cause of seeing.
• But actually, it was the rays of light striking his eyes that made him see.
• The blind man confused the succession of events with causation.

David Hume's Support

• There is no natural glue (causal link) that holds events together.
• Events occur one after another.
• This is known as Hume's skepticism about causation.

Why This Matters

• It emphasizes the supremacy of God's will over natural laws.
• It raises questions about the nature of causation and miracles.
• It influenced David Hume and other Western philosophers.
• It teaches us to distinguish between correlation and causation.

Important Points

• 1. Al-Ghazali initially believed in necessary causation.
• 2. Later, he departed from this view.
• 3. He argued that what we observe is a continuation of events, not direct causation.
• 4. He said that all things have a nature and act in a habitual way.
• 5. He argued that God created the universe and He can suspend the habitual succession of events according to His wish.
• 6. He gave the example of a blind man who confused the succession of events with causation.
• 7. David Hume supported Al-Ghazali's approach.
• 8. Hume added that there is no natural glue (causal link) that holds events together.
• 9. God shows miracles by suspending the causal link and habitual course of events.
• 10. Al-Ghazali's departure emphasizes the supremacy of God's will over natural laws.

Remember

• - Al-Ghazali's Departure = From necessary causation to habitual succession
• - Reason: Necessary causation would reject God's will
• - New view: Events are a continuation, not direct causation
• - Key idea: God can suspend the habitual succession of events
• - Blind man example: Confused succession with causation
• - David Hume: Supported Al-Ghazali's approach
• - Miracles: God shows miracles by suspending the causal link

Common Mistakes

• 1. Thinking Al-Ghazali always believed in necessary causation: He later departed from this view.
• 2. Confusing correlation with causation: Just because two events occur together does not mean one causes the other.
• 3. Forgetting the role of God's will: Al-Ghazali emphasized that God's will is above all natural laws.
• 4. Ignoring the blind man example: It illustrates the confusion between succession and causation.
• 5. Believing Hume was the first to question causation: Al-Ghazali preceded Hume in questioning necessary causation.

Quick Revision

• Al-Ghazali initially believed in necessary causation.
• Later, he departed from this view.
• He argued that what we observe is a continuation of events, not direct causation.
• He said that all things have a nature and act in a habitual way.
• He argued that God created the universe and He can suspend the habitual succession of events according to His wish.
• He gave the example of a blind man who confused the succession of events with causation.
• David Hume supported Al-Ghazali's approach.
• Hume added that there is no natural glue (causal link) that holds events together.
• God shows miracles by suspending the causal link and habitual course of events.
• Al-Ghazali's departure emphasizes the supremacy of God's will over natural laws.

60-Second Revision

• Al-Ghazali's Departure = From necessary causation to habitual succession
• Reason: Necessary causation would reject God's will
• New view: Events are a continuation, not direct causation
• Key idea: God can suspend the habitual succession of events
• Blind man example: Confused succession with causation
• David Hume: Supported Al-Ghazali's approach
• Miracles: God shows miracles by suspending the causal link

NEXT TOPIC